Conformpack

The accessibility conformance report your RFP is waiting on.

A procurement asked for an ACR and the deadline is close. Conformpack runs a real accessibility scan of your product pages, walks you through attesting the criteria a scanner can't see, and delivers a correctly formatted, honestly-scoped report the same day — as a PDF, a hosted page, and a machine-readable copy.

$499 per report. You see your Supports / Not Evaluated mix before you pay.

Sample conformance report

Generated by the same pipeline paying customers use, for a clearly-labeled fictional vendor over a well-known public web product.

  • Every WCAG 2.1 A/AA criterion, one row each — with the conformance level and a remark naming its evidence: scan finding or vendor attestation, never adjectives.
  • A real scan behind it — axe-core 4.11.4 over 3 public pages on 2026-08-28; when the scan finds failures, remarks cite the rule, page, and instance count.
  • Honest levels, visibly mixed — this sample reads 33 Supports · 3 Does Not Support · 2 Not Applicable · 12 Not Evaluated, because that is what its inputs support.

Open the full sample report

How it works

  1. Step 1

    List your product and pages

    Product name and version, plus 2–5 URLs of your product that we scan for real. The scan runs the same automated accessibility engine on every page and records rule ids, pages, and instance counts.

  2. Step 2

    Answer the guided questionnaire

    Many WCAG criteria can't be checked by a scanner — keyboard flows, captions, error recovery. Each one gets a plain-language question with a how-to-check note, and honest answers include "we don't support this" and "we haven't evaluated this."

  3. Step 3

    See the mix, then get the report

    Before you pay, you see exactly how many criteria will read Supports, Does Not Support, and Not Evaluated. After checkout the report arrives within the hour: a formatted PDF, a hosted page, and a machine-readable JSON copy.

Why an honest report beats an optimistic one

  • Evidence a reviewer can verify. Scan findings carry the rule id, the page, and the instance count. A reviewer can re-run the same check and get the same answer — which is what makes the rest of the report credible.
  • Claims capped by the scan. If the scan found failures on a criterion, no attestation can mark it Supports. The honesty is enforced by the mechanism, not by anyone's optimism on a deadline.
  • Scope stated, not implied. The report names exactly which pages were scanned and when, which criteria carry your attestations, and what was not evaluated — the frame a self-attestation legally needs.

Questions vendors actually ask

What exactly do I get?

An Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) covering every WCAG 2.1 A and AA success criterion, in the table structure procurement reviewers expect from the ITI VPAT® 2.5 WCAG edition. It comes as a signed-ready PDF, a hosted page you can link from an RFP response, and a JSON copy for portals and automated intake. Every remark is labeled as scan evidence (with rule id, page, and instance count) or as your own attestation.

Is this a certification?

No, and no honest ACR is. An ACR is the vendor's own self-attestation — you review the report and submit it as your statement. What Conformpack adds over a hand-filled template is machine evidence a reviewer can verify, correct formatting, and an honesty mechanism: an attestation can never upgrade a criterion past what the scan found.

What does "Not Evaluated" mean, and will it sink my bid?

It means neither the scan nor your attestations covered that criterion, and the report says so instead of guessing. Procurement reviewers see hand-filled reports claiming full support with no evidence all the time; a scoped, evidence-cited report with some Not Evaluated rows is a credible document, and you see the full mix before paying so there are no surprises.

How is this different from hiring a consultant?

Accessibility consultancies produce audited reports with human testing depth that an automated scan cannot match — at prices typically $2,000 and up and multi-week timelines (see published pricing at adacompliancepros.com and accessible.org). Conformpack is for the vendor who needs a credible, honestly-scoped report this week: a real scan plus your attestations, correctly formatted, same day, $499.

What can the automated scan actually see?

Automated engines reliably detect only part of the WCAG success criteria — missing alt text, contrast failures, broken labels, and similar machine-checkable issues. Criteria that need human judgment carry your attestation or stay Not Evaluated. The report's methodology note states exactly which pages were scanned, when, and with what engine.

Is Conformpack affiliated with ITI or the VPAT program?

No. The report follows the table structure of the ITI VPAT® 2.5 WCAG edition so reviewers recognize it. VPAT is a registered service mark of the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI); Conformpack is independent and not endorsed by ITI.

What does it cost, and when would I buy again?

$499 per report, one time. A report is dated and scoped to a product version, so vendors typically return for a fresh report when they ship a major version or when a new procurement asks for a current date.

What about refunds?

Two verifiable conditions. If the report is not generated or not delivered because of our system, we refund automatically. If our logs show you never viewed or downloaded the report after delivery, contact support within 30 days and we refund the purchase.

The report follows the table structure of the ITI VPAT® 2.5 WCAG edition. VPAT is a registered service mark of the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI). Consultant pricing referenced above: adacompliancepros.com and accessible.org.